A TwitterScore alternative that measures money, not prestige
TwitterScore and Wallet Match both look at an account's followers and both return a number. They are measuring different things, and the difference decides which one you want.
TwitterScore asks who follows this account. It scores from 0 to 1000 based on how many credible crypto accounts, funds and founders are in the follower list, on the reasoning that bots can inflate a follower count but cannot fake genuine interest from respected accounts.
Wallet Match asks what those followers hold. It resolves each follower to their on-chain wallets and reports the total, the median, and how the audience splits across balance tiers.
What TwitterScore does well
- The 0 to 1000 score is a genuinely good credibility signal, and it is fast. One number, one glance.
- Tracking which funds and known accounts follow a project is something we do not do at all.
- Broad coverage of crypto X, with historical score data and bulk checking.
- An API, if you want scores inside your own tooling.
The question it does not answer
A high TwitterScore means respected people are watching. It does not mean the audience can transact.
An account followed by fifty funds and ten thousand people holding nothing scores well and converts badly. That gap is invisible to a prestige score, and it is the gap you pay for when you buy a post.
Side by side
| TwitterScore | Wallet Match | |
|---|---|---|
| What it measures | How influential the followers are | How much the followers hold on-chain |
| Unit of the answer | Score, 0 to 1000 | Dollars, plus median and balance tiers |
| Bot detection | Implied by the score | Implied by wallet history, since bots have none |
| Fund and founder tracking | Yes | No |
| Reverse lookup, wallet to socials | No | Yes |
| Pricing model | Subscription, API tiers listed from $79 a month | Pay per lookup, credits from $10, no subscription |
TwitterScore details checked 26 August 2026 against their own site. Pricing and features change, so verify before you decide.
Which one to use
- You want a fast credibility read before a partnership call.
- You care who is watching an account more than what they own.
- You need scores in bulk, inside your own product, through an API.
- You are about to pay for a post and want to know if that audience can afford your product.
- You need the actual numbers, not a score: how many wallets, what they hold, how it is distributed.
- You want to work backwards from a wallet to the person behind it.
Plenty of teams run both. They answer different questions and neither replaces the other.
Check an audience before you pay for it
Paste a handle on the home page and the preview scan resolves the first slice of that account's followers to wallets, no account needed.